AP EXPLAINS: What apos;s At Stake As US Cedes Internet Control
De Wikifliping
| Revisión de 05:30 28 feb 2023 VonFriedman7218 (Discusión | contribuciones) ← Ir a diferencia anterior |
Revisión de 11:16 28 feb 2023 OOMBonny604 (Discusión | contribuciones) Ir a siguiente diferencia → |
||
| Línea 1: | Línea 1: | ||
| - | Nov 26 (Reuters) - The price for Russian seaborne oil should be capped at between $30 and $40 per barrel, lower than the level that Group of Seven nations have proposed, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said on Saturday.<br><br>funding for the internet's early development. It's a historical arrangement stemming from U.S. The domain name system we're familiar with dates back to 1984, long before "Pokemon Go" or even Amazon.com came alon<br><br><br><br>He told the paper that good neighbourly relations were "significant not only for the two countries but for Europe as a whole" and that Germany believed that open issues must be resolved through dialogue based on international law.<br><br>LONDON, Oct 15 (Reuters) - Rival semiconductor giants ARM and Intel have agreed to work together to manage networks of connected devices from both firms, clearing a major stumbling block to market growth of the so-called Internet of Things (IoT).<br><br>The idea of the cap is to prohibit shipping, insurance and online taxi athens re-insurance companies from handling cargoes of Russian crude around the globe, unless it is sold for less than the price set by the G7 and its allies.<br><br><br><br>Most of the world's biggest suppliers of IoT chips rely on low-power ARM designs, including NXP, Renesas and Microchip's Atmel, while Intel, known for its powerful data-crunching processors, dominates the cloud data centre market, where IoT data are analysed and processed, Gartner analyst Bill Ray said.<br><br>Relations between [https://en.volos-minivan.eu/ATHENS-0000000093-taxi-Thessaloniki-greece.html taxi Thessaloniki greece] and Germany have improved since the Greek debt crisis that broke out in late 2009 and forced Athens to sign up to three international bailouts on tough and unpopular austerity terms, many of them suggested by Germany.<br><br>ICANN already had such a multi-party approach. government insisted that businesses, academics and other parties also get seats at the table. agreed in June to relinquish control to ICANN after the organization created additional mechanisms to resolve dispute<br><br>"We see a significant acceleration in terms of how the market will grow in terms of the number of managed devices and the volume of data that moves through these systems," Himagiri Mukkamala, an ARM senior vice president and general manager for transportation in greece athens its IoT Cloud Services division, told Reuters in an interview.<br><br>(One common charge: It took too long to permit domain names in languages other than English.) And many countries believe that as long as the U. ICANN has taken its share of complaints over the years, often for being slow to adapt as the internet grew.<br><br><br><br>Britain's ARM, a unit of Japan's Softbank Corp, said on Monday it had struck a strategic partnership with Intel to use common standards developed by Intel for piraeus bus to athens managing IoT devices, connections and data.<br><br>In fact, taxi athens greece few people would even know about the transition were it not for the noise from Capitol Hil The directories themselves aren't changing, and people don't interact directly with domain names as often in the era of Google searches, phone apps and Facebook links.<br><br>ARM's recently introduced Pelion IoT management platform will rely on Intel's Secure Device Onboard specifications announced a year ago.<br>This will allow customers using IoT chips based on either company's products to manage them in the same system, executives at the two companies said in separate blog posts. (Reporting by Eric Auchard in London; editing by Jason Neely)<br><br>Clark recovered from his injuries but declined to give a statement to officers.<br>Westwood was arrested after she admitted to stabbing him in self-defence. Police were called to the scene by Westwood's father and found Clark lying on the pavement outside with blood pouring from his wounds.<br><br>But the mother-of-two wept as she was given a 16-month jail term suspended for two years after prosecutors accepted her plea to the lesser charge of unlawful wounding due to Clark's abusive behaviour. Last December at Minshull Street Crown Court Westwood faced jail after being charged with causing grievous bodily harm with intent.<br><br>Their efforts failed, though, as budget negotiators left out the transition ba Ironically, those wanting the U.S.<br>to maintain its oversight role includes a group called Americans for Limited Government. Donald Trump also came out in support of Cruz, his one-time rival for the GOP presidential nomination.<br><br>For instance, Thessaloniki escorted tours can a Google critic register google-sucks.org, or does Google get first dibs?<br>What about creating a domain name suffix just for porn sites? It has nothing to do, though, with what websites publish. All it does is make sure your browser can find those site Control over the DNS mostly amounts to deciding what gets included in those directories.<br><br>During that terrifying 3am head-to-head confrontation, Clarke broke down the front door of Westwood's home and lunged at her with the broken bottle of vodka only for her to fight back and stab him twice in the chest.<br><br>has been in charge of the DNS system for more than three decades. Plans to privatize control of these functions by transferring them to a nonprofit oversight organization have been in the works since the late 1990 | + | AP EXPLAINS: What's at stake as US cedes internet control By <br> Published: 18:28 GMT, 29 September 2016 | Updated: 18:28 GMT, 29 September 2016 <br> </a> <br>NEW YORK (AP) — On Saturday, the U.S.<br><br>government plans to cede control of some of the internet's core systems — namely, the directories that help web browsers and apps know where to find the latest weather, maps and Facebook musings.<br><br>Will you even notice? Probably not, although the subject has become a hot political issue for some conservatives.<br><br>Here's a look at the systems in question and what's at stake for internet users.<br><br>___<br> FILE - In this Thursday, March 3, 2016, file photo, people work on a job search on a computer at an office in Atlanta.<br><br>On Saturday, Oct. 1, 2016, the U.S. government plans to cede control of some of the internet¿s core systems, namely, the directories that help web browsers and apps know where to find the latest weather, maps and Facebook musings. (AP Photo/David Goldman, File)<br> <br>WAIT, THE U.S.<br>GOVERNMENT CONTROLS THE INTERNET?<br><br>No single government, business, organization or individual controls all the computers and pipelines making up the internet. But the network relies on an addressing system called the domain name system, or DNS, which includes directories that help route data like email and web requests where it needs to go.<br><br>And someone needs to run the DNS.<br><br>Control over the DNS mostly amounts to deciding what gets included in those directories. For instance, can a Google critic register google-sucks.org, or does Google get first dibs?<br>What about creating a domain name suffix just for porn sites? It has nothing to do, though, with what websites publish. All it does is make sure your browser can find those sites.<br><br>___<br><br>SO DOES THE U.S.<br><br>RUN THAT SYSTEM?<br><br>Since 1998, an organization called the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers has overseen the directories, mostly by setting rules and creating mechanisms for settling disputes. But ICANN also has a boss at the U.S.<br>Commerce Department.<br><br>It's a historical arrangement stemming from U.S. funding for the internet's early development. The domain name system we're familiar with dates back to 1984, long before "Pokemon Go" or even Amazon.com came along.<br><br>___<br><br>WHY DO PEOPLE CARE ABOUT THE TRANFER?<br><br>The U.S.<br><br>has been in charge of the DNS system for more than three decades. Plans to privatize control of these functions by transferring them to a nonprofit oversight organization have been in the works since the late 1990s.<br><br>As this Saturday's transfer date approached, some Republicans in Congress raised late objections, terming it a "giveaway" to the rest of the world.<br><br>But they failed to block the move in a spending bill to keep the government operating.<br><br>Late Wednesday, the attorneys general from Texas, Arizona, Oklahoma and Nevada — all Republicans — filed a federal lawsuit to block the transfer because of worries it might affect government websites ending in ".gov."<br><br>___<br><br>WHY THE U.S.<br><br>IS BACKING AWAY<br><br>ICANN has taken its share of complaints over the years, often for being slow to adapt as the internet grew. (One common charge: It took too long to permit domain names in languages other than English.) And many countries believe that as long as the U.S.<br><br>retains oversight — even if it leaves day-to-day management to ICANN — the internet cannot be truly international.<br><br>Some governments have sought to transfer control to a U.N agency, the International Telecommunication Union. But critics objected to letting authoritarian regimes like Iran and China get equal votes on matters affecting speech.<br><br>Instead, the U.S.<br><br>government insisted that businesses, academics and other parties also get seats at the table. ICANN already had such a multi-party approach. The U.S. agreed in June to relinquish control to ICANN after the organization created additional mechanisms to resolve disputes.<br><br>___<br><br>WILL ANYTHING CHANGE FOR USERS?<br><br>Not much.<br><br>The directories themselves aren't changing, and people don't interact directly with domain names as often in the era of Google searches, phone apps and Facebook links. In fact, few people would even know about the transition were it not for the noise from Capitol Hill.<br><br>___<br><br>REPUBLICANS RAISE ALARM<br><br>Republican critics claim that the transition would give countries like Russian and China the ability to control online speech — something supporters of the transition plan deny given the multi-party approach.<br><br>Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas is among those who tried to block the transition as part of a short-term spending bill to keep the government running past Friday.<br><br>Donald Trump also came out in support of Cruz, his one-time rival for the GOP presidential nomination. Ironically, those wanting the U.S.<br>to maintain its oversight role includes a group called Americans for Limited Government. Their efforts failed, though, as budget negotiators left out the transition ban.<br><br>___<br><br>A LAST-DITCH LAWSUIT<br><br>Four state attorneys general asked a federal court in Galveston, Texas, to block the move.<br><br>Commerce and ICANN have delegated control of the ".gov" suffix to the U.S. General Services Administration. GSA handles day-to-day management of which government websites can use the suffix. Though the lawsuit claims that GSA decisions are submitted to ICANN for approval, that isn't the case.<br><br>ICANN does have trademark and other policies governing sites using particular suffixes, but they cover suffixes available to anyone. The ".gov" suffix is restricted to government agencies in the U.S.<br><br>The lawsuit also claims that ICANN could delete ".gov" entirely from the directories or delegate management of ".gov" websites to someone else.<br><br>That's possible, but highly unlikely, and the attorneys general offer no evidence that ICANN would do either.<br><br><br><br>If you have any inquiries relating to where and how to make use of [https://en.volos-minivan.eu/ATHENS-0000000257-taxi-online-Meteora-greece.html taxi online Meteora greece], you could call us at our web site. |
Revisión de 11:16 28 feb 2023
AP EXPLAINS: What's at stake as US cedes internet control By
Published: 18:28 GMT, 29 September 2016 | Updated: 18:28 GMT, 29 September 2016
</a>
NEW YORK (AP) — On Saturday, the U.S.
government plans to cede control of some of the internet's core systems — namely, the directories that help web browsers and apps know where to find the latest weather, maps and Facebook musings.
Will you even notice? Probably not, although the subject has become a hot political issue for some conservatives.
Here's a look at the systems in question and what's at stake for internet users.
___
FILE - In this Thursday, March 3, 2016, file photo, people work on a job search on a computer at an office in Atlanta.
On Saturday, Oct. 1, 2016, the U.S. government plans to cede control of some of the internet¿s core systems, namely, the directories that help web browsers and apps know where to find the latest weather, maps and Facebook musings. (AP Photo/David Goldman, File)
WAIT, THE U.S.
GOVERNMENT CONTROLS THE INTERNET?
No single government, business, organization or individual controls all the computers and pipelines making up the internet. But the network relies on an addressing system called the domain name system, or DNS, which includes directories that help route data like email and web requests where it needs to go.
And someone needs to run the DNS.
Control over the DNS mostly amounts to deciding what gets included in those directories. For instance, can a Google critic register google-sucks.org, or does Google get first dibs?
What about creating a domain name suffix just for porn sites? It has nothing to do, though, with what websites publish. All it does is make sure your browser can find those sites.
___
SO DOES THE U.S.
RUN THAT SYSTEM?
Since 1998, an organization called the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers has overseen the directories, mostly by setting rules and creating mechanisms for settling disputes. But ICANN also has a boss at the U.S.
Commerce Department.
It's a historical arrangement stemming from U.S. funding for the internet's early development. The domain name system we're familiar with dates back to 1984, long before "Pokemon Go" or even Amazon.com came along.
___
WHY DO PEOPLE CARE ABOUT THE TRANFER?
The U.S.
has been in charge of the DNS system for more than three decades. Plans to privatize control of these functions by transferring them to a nonprofit oversight organization have been in the works since the late 1990s.
As this Saturday's transfer date approached, some Republicans in Congress raised late objections, terming it a "giveaway" to the rest of the world.
But they failed to block the move in a spending bill to keep the government operating.
Late Wednesday, the attorneys general from Texas, Arizona, Oklahoma and Nevada — all Republicans — filed a federal lawsuit to block the transfer because of worries it might affect government websites ending in ".gov."
___
WHY THE U.S.
IS BACKING AWAY
ICANN has taken its share of complaints over the years, often for being slow to adapt as the internet grew. (One common charge: It took too long to permit domain names in languages other than English.) And many countries believe that as long as the U.S.
retains oversight — even if it leaves day-to-day management to ICANN — the internet cannot be truly international.
Some governments have sought to transfer control to a U.N agency, the International Telecommunication Union. But critics objected to letting authoritarian regimes like Iran and China get equal votes on matters affecting speech.
Instead, the U.S.
government insisted that businesses, academics and other parties also get seats at the table. ICANN already had such a multi-party approach. The U.S. agreed in June to relinquish control to ICANN after the organization created additional mechanisms to resolve disputes.
___
WILL ANYTHING CHANGE FOR USERS?
Not much.
The directories themselves aren't changing, and people don't interact directly with domain names as often in the era of Google searches, phone apps and Facebook links. In fact, few people would even know about the transition were it not for the noise from Capitol Hill.
___
REPUBLICANS RAISE ALARM
Republican critics claim that the transition would give countries like Russian and China the ability to control online speech — something supporters of the transition plan deny given the multi-party approach.
Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas is among those who tried to block the transition as part of a short-term spending bill to keep the government running past Friday.
Donald Trump also came out in support of Cruz, his one-time rival for the GOP presidential nomination. Ironically, those wanting the U.S.
to maintain its oversight role includes a group called Americans for Limited Government. Their efforts failed, though, as budget negotiators left out the transition ban.
___
A LAST-DITCH LAWSUIT
Four state attorneys general asked a federal court in Galveston, Texas, to block the move.
Commerce and ICANN have delegated control of the ".gov" suffix to the U.S. General Services Administration. GSA handles day-to-day management of which government websites can use the suffix. Though the lawsuit claims that GSA decisions are submitted to ICANN for approval, that isn't the case.
ICANN does have trademark and other policies governing sites using particular suffixes, but they cover suffixes available to anyone. The ".gov" suffix is restricted to government agencies in the U.S.
The lawsuit also claims that ICANN could delete ".gov" entirely from the directories or delegate management of ".gov" websites to someone else.
That's possible, but highly unlikely, and the attorneys general offer no evidence that ICANN would do either.
If you have any inquiries relating to where and how to make use of taxi online Meteora greece, you could call us at our web site.
